430mhz data transfer

From low tech network
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(amplifiers for 70cm)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Mesh networks using 2.4 Ghz wifi are becoming popular, but are they really practical for anywhere other than extremely densely populated cities? It would be better to have something more practical which could give access to those in the countryside, as well as on vehicles and boats.
+
Mesh networks using 2.4 or 5 Ghz wifi are becoming popular, and are very practical in densely populated areas. But it would be good to have something more robust for very rural areas.
  
A way to get around the range limitations of 2.4GHz wifi, could be to convert it directly down to a lower frequency, meaning we no longer have the near line-of-sight limitation of typical 802.11.  A couple of wireless cards are able to do just this.  Simply take 2.4GHz, chop off the 2 and you have 400MHz.  There is an amateur band just above 400Mhz - the International Telecommunications Union allocates 430-440MHz for amateurs, and in some countries its wider.
+
A way to get around the range limitations of 2.4 Ghz wifi, could be to convert it directly down to a lower frequency, meaning we no longer have the near line-of-sight limitation of typical 802.11.  A couple of wireless cards are able to do just this.  They the take 2.4GHz system, remove the 2GHz, leaving 400MHz.  On the software side it continues to function with the 2.4GHz channel system.  There is an amateur band just above 400Mhz - the International Telecommunications Union allocates 430-440MHz for amateurs, and in some countries its wider.  However the use of highbandwith data transmission on this band remains a legal grey area.  
 
[[File:Dl435.jpg|center|200px]]
 
[[File:Dl435.jpg|center|200px]]
Singapore based Doodle labs produce the [http://doodlelabs.com/products/sub-ghz-range/420-450-mhz-band-dl435.html DL435-30 transceiver board] and Canadian XAGYL Communications produce the [http://www.xagyl.com/store/product.php?productid=16450&cat=251&page=1 XC420M].  Both are mini PCI cards which operate at 420-450MHz and can work with linux wifi drivers.  The problem is bandwidth; at microwave frequencies the 10MHz bandwith used by 802.11 wifi is not much, but at 400MHz it is a big chunk of the spectrum and likely to interfere with other things - many common radio controlled devices operate on 433MHz.  Luckily it is possible to configure 802.11 to squeeze into 5Mhz.   
+
Singapore based Doodle labs produce the [http://doodlelabs.com/products/sub-ghz-range/420-450-mhz-band-dl435.html DL435-30 transceiver board] and Canadian XAGYL Communications produce the [http://www.xagyl.com/store/product.php?productid=16450&cat=251&page=1 XC420M].  Both are mini PCI cards which operate at 420-450MHz and can work with linux wifi drivers.  The problem is bandwidth; at microwave frequencies the 10MHz or 20MHz wide channels used by 802.11 wifi is not much, but at 400MHz it is a big chunk of the spectrum and likely to interfere with other things - many common radio controlled devices (for example garage doors) operate on 433MHz.  Luckily it is possible to configure 802.11 to squeeze into 5Mhz, of course compromising transmission rate.   
  
 
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/70-centimeter_band 70cm amateur band english wikipedia article]
 
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/70-centimeter_band 70cm amateur band english wikipedia article]
Line 13: Line 13:
 
   
 
   
 
=====software=====
 
=====software=====
The cards 'appear' to be normal 2.4GHz wifi cards, so not many software changes are required.  The Ubiquiti Routerstation, comes with OpenWRT Kamikaze.  Most of the experiments I have read about use [http://www.dd-wrt.com DD-wrt], which has an easy to use web-based interface with a build in option to change the channel with to 10 or 5 MHz (necessary on 430MHz). However, DD-WRT is commercial software, not open source, and the trial version does not allow ssh access.  nbd from the OpenWRT project gave quick instructions on how to get the routerstation working with the DL435-30 with a 5MHz channel width, after flashing the firmware from [http://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/trunk/ar71xx/ http://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/trunk/ar71xx/]
+
The cards 'appear' to be normal 2.4GHz wifi cards, so not many software changes are required.  The Ubiquiti Routerstation, comes with OpenWRT Kamikaze.  Most of the experiments I have read about use [http://www.dd-wrt.com DD-wrt], which has an easy to use web-based interface with a build in option to change the channel with to 10 or 5 MHz (necessary on 430MHz). However, DD-WRT is commercial software, not open source, and the trial version does not allow ssh access to the router.  nbd from the OpenWRT project gave quick instructions on how to get the routerstation working with the DL435-30 with a 5MHz channel width, after flashing the firmware from [http://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/trunk/ar71xx/ http://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/trunk/ar71xx/]
  
 
  <nowiki>opkg update
 
  <nowiki>opkg update
Line 29: Line 29:
  
 
=====antennas=====
 
=====antennas=====
A simple 1/4 wave antenna is 14cm long.  The links below show some other designs.  
+
A simple 1/4 wave antenna is around 14cm long (depending on the channel used).  The links below show some other designs.  
 
* [http://users.skynet.be/deswert.luc/70%20cm%206%20element%20beam.htm 6 Element directional yagi]
 
* [http://users.skynet.be/deswert.luc/70%20cm%206%20element%20beam.htm 6 Element directional yagi]
 
* [http://www.dxzone.com/catalog/Antennas/70cm/ DXzone's 70cm antenna links]
 
* [http://www.dxzone.com/catalog/Antennas/70cm/ DXzone's 70cm antenna links]
Line 36: Line 36:
  
 
=====amplifiers for 70cm=====
 
=====amplifiers for 70cm=====
The UK foundation amateur power limit is 10w.  I wonder what amateurs would think about people using these frequencies for this kind data transfer because even at 5Mhz bandwidth, it would hog the band a bit.
+
The UK foundation amateur power limit on this band is 10w.  Anywhere other than extremely remote countryside, using these frequencies for this kind data transfer would probably cause interference with other amateurs.  Even with 5Mhz channels, this is a considerable chunk of the band.  Therefore using amplifiers is perhaps not a great idea. It is also not clear if this equipment would be damaged by such high power signals. 
  
These links are to build a considerably more powerful amplifier.   
+
That said, the links below are to build a considerably more powerful amplifier.  This is clearly not a good idea!  But probably a similar design could be used with lower power mosfets.
 
* [http://www.w6pql.com/500w_70cm_amplifier.htm 500w 70cm amplifier kit] and [http://www.w6pql.com/70cm/500wassembly.htm assembly guide]
 
* [http://www.w6pql.com/500w_70cm_amplifier.htm 500w 70cm amplifier kit] and [http://www.w6pql.com/70cm/500wassembly.htm assembly guide]
 
* [http://www.w6pql.com/70cm/MRFE6VP5600H.pdf the mosfet datasheet]
 
* [http://www.w6pql.com/70cm/MRFE6VP5600H.pdf the mosfet datasheet]
Line 47: Line 47:
 
* [http://www.cellular-news.com/story/30536.php WiMAX Demo Shows a 50km Broadband Internet Connection at 450MHz] Telsima on cellular news
 
* [http://www.cellular-news.com/story/30536.php WiMAX Demo Shows a 50km Broadband Internet Connection at 450MHz] Telsima on cellular news
 
* [http://qsl.net/kb9mwr/projects/wireless/70cm-ATV-HSMM.html 70cm ATV History and case for modified future HSMM use] Mostly talks about lisencing issues in the US but has some ideas about data networks on 70cm
 
* [http://qsl.net/kb9mwr/projects/wireless/70cm-ATV-HSMM.html 70cm ATV History and case for modified future HSMM use] Mostly talks about lisencing issues in the US but has some ideas about data networks on 70cm
* [http://www.rason.org/Projects/gelcell/gelcell.htm 12 volt gel cell charger plans]
 
 
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_over_Ethernet Power over ethernet]
 
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_over_Ethernet Power over ethernet]
 
* [http://www.daveakerman.com/?p=592 Using the raspberry pi to transmit camera images] This project also uses the 430MHz amateur band, but at 300 baud, using the [http://www.radiometrix.com/content/ntx2 Radiometrix NTX2]
 
* [http://www.daveakerman.com/?p=592 Using the raspberry pi to transmit camera images] This project also uses the 430MHz amateur band, but at 300 baud, using the [http://www.radiometrix.com/content/ntx2 Radiometrix NTX2]
 +
* [http://www.spiderbeam.com spiderbeam] make and sell fibreglass antenna masts up to 26m high

Latest revision as of 15:19, 14 May 2014

Mesh networks using 2.4 or 5 Ghz wifi are becoming popular, and are very practical in densely populated areas. But it would be good to have something more robust for very rural areas.

A way to get around the range limitations of 2.4 Ghz wifi, could be to convert it directly down to a lower frequency, meaning we no longer have the near line-of-sight limitation of typical 802.11. A couple of wireless cards are able to do just this. They the take 2.4GHz system, remove the 2GHz, leaving 400MHz. On the software side it continues to function with the 2.4GHz channel system. There is an amateur band just above 400Mhz - the International Telecommunications Union allocates 430-440MHz for amateurs, and in some countries its wider. However the use of highbandwith data transmission on this band remains a legal grey area.

Dl435.jpg

Singapore based Doodle labs produce the DL435-30 transceiver board and Canadian XAGYL Communications produce the XC420M. Both are mini PCI cards which operate at 420-450MHz and can work with linux wifi drivers. The problem is bandwidth; at microwave frequencies the 10MHz or 20MHz wide channels used by 802.11 wifi is not much, but at 400MHz it is a big chunk of the spectrum and likely to interfere with other things - many common radio controlled devices (for example garage doors) operate on 433MHz. Luckily it is possible to configure 802.11 to squeeze into 5Mhz, of course compromising transmission rate.

The advantage, compared with packet radio or other data transmission techniques is that the hardware/firmware/software for 802.11 systems is already widely used and needs only modifying slightly. The computer 'sees' the 430MHz wireless card as a normal 2.4GHz wifi device, with the usual channels etc.


Contents

software

The cards 'appear' to be normal 2.4GHz wifi cards, so not many software changes are required. The Ubiquiti Routerstation, comes with OpenWRT Kamikaze. Most of the experiments I have read about use DD-wrt, which has an easy to use web-based interface with a build in option to change the channel with to 10 or 5 MHz (necessary on 430MHz). However, DD-WRT is commercial software, not open source, and the trial version does not allow ssh access to the router. nbd from the OpenWRT project gave quick instructions on how to get the routerstation working with the DL435-30 with a 5MHz channel width, after flashing the firmware from http://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/trunk/ar71xx/

opkg update

 # install the right wireless driver
 opkg install kmod-ath5k

 # re-run wifi device detection
 wifi detect > /etc/config/wireless

 # edit /etc/config/wireless, enable wifi, set
 # 'option chanbw 5'

It is also useful to install the LuCI web user interface.

antennas

A simple 1/4 wave antenna is around 14cm long (depending on the channel used). The links below show some other designs.

amplifiers for 70cm

The UK foundation amateur power limit on this band is 10w. Anywhere other than extremely remote countryside, using these frequencies for this kind data transfer would probably cause interference with other amateurs. Even with 5Mhz channels, this is a considerable chunk of the band. Therefore using amplifiers is perhaps not a great idea. It is also not clear if this equipment would be damaged by such high power signals.

That said, the links below are to build a considerably more powerful amplifier. This is clearly not a good idea! But probably a similar design could be used with lower power mosfets.

other stuff
Personal tools